|
|||
| FAO-APHCA/OIE
Regional Workshop on Brucellosis Control and Diagnosis (with an emphasis
on B. melitensis), Chiang Mai and Lampang, Thailand, 20-23 October 2008.
FAO-APHCA and OIE Asia-Pacific Office, in collaboration with the FVM-CMU and DLD, jointly organized the Regional Workshop on Brucellosis Control and Diagnosis (with an emphasis on B. melitensis) in Chiang Mai and Lampang, Thailand, between 20 and 23 October 2008. Seventeen participants and 6 observers from 17 countries participated in the Workshop. This Workshop traces its roots from the 31st APHCA Session in 2007, when delegates from India and Iran requested APHCA to organize the Workshop. The proposal was approved by the Session. |
|||
![]() |
|||
| The Workshop consisted of lectures and laboratory demonstrations by invited speakers/ experts from the OIE/FAO Reference Laboratory for Brucellosis in France (Dr. Bruno Garin-Bastuji and Mr. Antoine Drapeau) and the National Institute for Animal Health (NIAH) of Thailand (Dr. Monaya Egkatat) as well as country paper presentations. | |||
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
A round table discussion was organized on 23 October where conclusion and
recommendations were made as the follows:
Considering that: 2. Brucellosis, including caprine and ovine brucellosis caused by B. melitensis, has been recognized in most member countries of the Asia and the Pacific Region, with a high rate of positive cases in some parts of the Region, and as a consequence, the high infection rate in human populations. The information on Brucellosis in pigs is not sufficient in the Region. 3. Several laboratory diagnostic tests are available for the identification of Brucella and for serological testing (in particular, RBT, CFT and iELISA) but no single serological test is applicable for all purposes of Brucellosis diagnosis. 4. PCR is, at present under development, a quicker diagnostic tool for Brucella detection. While the conventional Brucella typing methods remain standard tests, there is up-to-now no molecular typing system available to differentiate all Brucella strains. In general, all molecular tests are still expensive. 5. One of the constraints to more active Brucellosis diagnosis in the Asia and Pacific Region is to obtain diagnostic reagents such as Rose Bengal Test (RBT) antigens, which are essential for routine laboratory work. 6. It is considered that new tools for diagnosis are necessary but an epidemiology-based strategy is essential for testing regime design and results interpretation. 7. In addition to effective veterinary services, (i) educational programmes to other stakeholders such as farmers, including those for good farming management, (ii) effective enforcement of legislation in conjunction with animal disease control, (iii) public awareness and preparedness of the disease which is transmissible to humans, are all essential for the disease control and the development of long-term disease control strategies. The Workshop on Brucellosis Diagnosis
and Control recommends that: 9. Referring to item 2 above, the member countries should be encouraged to further investigate the epidemiological situation in livestock, in particular B. abortus and B. suis (for cattle and pigs, respectively). 10. National laboratories should keep the same standard operating procedures. According to the OIE requirements and as CFT is concerned, the national reference laboratory should make an effort to harmonize the operating procedures at least at a national level. 11. Establishment of a Reference Laboratory for Brucellosis for the Asia and Pacific Region should be considered in order to support the strengthening of laboratory capacity and activities of Brucellosis diagnosis and surveillance, and also for national brucellosis control strategies on the short and/or long term basis in the respective countries. Such a Reference Laboratory should provide services on diagnostic reagent and vaccine control as well as Brucella typing. For this purpose, the OIE twinning programme should be developed in this Region; for example, between the OIE/FAO Reference Laboratory for Brucellosis (France) and the National Institute of Animal Health (NIAH) in Thailand. Member countries request modest financial support from international agencies to cover the provision of RBT antigens. 12. Brucellosis control strategies including capacity building at laboratory diagnosis and surveillance should be further strengthened for the disease control and eventual eradication of the disease at the national and regional levels. Member countries request a follow-up workshop/training. 13. Epidemiology and diagnosis of Brucellosis are a key element for the sound development of control strategies, in particular taking into consideration the fact that Brucellosis is a herd/flock disease, and choice of tests and interpretation should always be based on epidemiological reality, as epidemiology of the disease is complex. 14. Selection of control and eradication strategies and decision of control levels, should include some disease control aspects based on the epidemiological situation, policies for the test and isolation/slaughter, animal movement management and for vaccination, while the circumstance surrounding the disease needs to take into consideration the political will, budget availability and capacity of Veterinary Services for disease control, animal/herd identification and availability of quality vaccines. The exclusive test and slaughter strategy should be limited to the regions/areas, where: (i) a herd prevalence of the disease is very low and (ii) adequate budget and the long-term political will are secured. In all other situations, vaccination should be considered as a basic control tool. The whole population vaccination should
be considered, where the herd prevalence is high and where animal movement
could not be effectively controlled. 15. International cooperation for Brucellosis diagnosis and control by FAO-APHCA and OIE should be continued for capacity building of national Veterinary Services in the Asia and Pacific region for development of a long term control programme of the disease. Follow-up actions: 1. The above conclusion and recommendations were presented at the 32nd APHCA Session (Bangkok, Thailand, 27-30 October 2008). 2. Proposal was made and budget was approved at the APHCA Session to organize a follow-up workshop in Khon Kaen, Thailand, tentatively in June/July 2009. Co-sponsorship and co-organization by OIE Asia-Pacific was confirmed. DLD agreed to collaborate. Steps to be undertaken towards a follow-up Workshop on Brucellosis Control and Diagnosis:
|
|||
| Copyright
@ 2008 - APHCA - All rights reserved. |
|||